Grading Economics
PSA vs SGC vs BGS vs CGC in 2026: Costs, Resale Value, and the Actual Math
Bayley Coleman · 2026-06-10 · updated 2026-06-11 · 9 min read
The short answer: PSA slabs sell for the most (a 10 typically brings 10 to 20% more than a comparable SGC 10 or BGS 9.5), but as of June 2, 2026 PSA paused its Value tiers, so the cheapest PSA option is now Regular at about $79.99. That tilts the math hard toward SGC and CGC on any card whose PSA 10 comps under roughly $300. BGS earns its fee only on pack-fresh premium modern with strong subgrades or a Black Label. The right answer changes card by card, which is why we model it instead of guessing.
Every flipper eventually asks the same question while holding a raw card: which grading company actually makes me the most money on THIS card? Not which slab looks best, and not which company is most famous. Which one nets the most after the grading fee, the resale difference, and the time your money sits in a slab.
The answer in one sentence: grading economics reduce to two numbers per company, what it costs to get the slab, and what the slab resells for. Everything else (turnaround, subgrades, label aesthetics) only matters through those two numbers. So here they are, sourced and dated, followed by the math.
Update, June 11, 2026: PSA paused all four Value tiers on June 2, 2026 amid a roughly 10 million card backlog. The cheapest active PSA tier is now Regular at about $79.99 per card, up from the $32.99 Value tier, a 142% jump. The costs and worked example below reflect that. Full story: PSA paused Value grading, what it means for flippers.
What does card grading cost in 2026?
| Company | Realistic entry cost per card | Notes | Turnaround at that tier |
|---|
| PSA | ~$79.99 (Regular) | Value tiers PAUSED June 2, 2026 over a ~10M-card backlog; the old ~$33 Value tier is gone for now. Membership still $149 to $199/yr | Regular extended to ~40 to 50 days |
| SGC | $15 to $30 | Economy around $15 with long waits; standard tiers $18 to $30; no membership required | Economy 60+ business days; standard ~25+ |
| BGS | $25 (Standard) | Subgrades included free; no membership, no minimums, no upcharges for high grades | 20 to 30 business days |
| CGC | $15 to $18 (Bulk and Economy) | Prices rose January 6, 2026; Standard jumped to $55 | Economy ~65+ business days |
Sources for the table are listed at the bottom; fees move often, so treat anything older than a few months as suspect and check the company's own page before submitting.
Two structural notes that change the comparison more than the sticker prices:
- PSA's cheap path is closed right now. With the Value tiers paused (June 2, 2026), the cheapest way into a PSA slab is Regular at about $79.99 per card, roughly triple the old Value price. That single change is enough to flip which grader wins on anything but high-value cards.
- BGS includes subgrades on every card at no extra cost, and BGS is the only major grader where the realistic top outcome (a 9.5, or the rare 10 and Black Label) changes the resale math by multiples rather than percentages.
Which grading company's slabs sell for the most?
PSA, and it is not close in liquidity terms. As of 2026, PSA holds roughly two thirds of the graded-sports-card market, and a PSA 10 typically commands 10 to 20% more at resale than a comparable SGC 10 or BGS 9.5. SGC is the clear number two by volume, though industry tracking showed its grading volume falling about 24% in 2025.
The honest way to read that: a PSA premium of 10 to 20% is not loyalty or branding mystique, it is liquidity. More buyers search for PSA slabs, so PSA slabs clear faster and at tighter spreads. When you sell an SGC, BGS, or CGC slab, you give up some price, and often some speed, which is itself a cost when your bankroll is sitting in the card.
Two real exceptions:
- BGS on premium modern. A BGS 9.5 with strong subgrades can sell above a comparable PSA 10 on pack-fresh modern chrome, and a BGS 10 or Black Label can sell for multiples. This is a lottery ticket (four near-perfect subgrades required), not a baseline, but on the right card it is a real tail.
- CGC on Pokemon and TCG. CGC's resale has become genuinely competitive with PSA in that segment. For sports cards, CGC still resells at a discount.
The actual math: one card, four slabs
Take a modern chrome rookie whose PSA 10 comp is $200 (illustrative, but run your own card the same way). The Report Card's default model prices non-PSA slabs as a fraction of the PSA comp: SGC and CGC at about 80%, BGS at about 82%. Those defaults are editable, and they reflect the typical 10 to 20% market discount above.
| Path | Likely gem outcome | Resale (model) | Entry fee | Resale minus fee |
|---|
| PSA | PSA 10 | $200 | ~$80 (Regular) | ~$120 |
| SGC | SGC 10 | ~$160 | ~$20 | ~$140 |
| CGC | CGC 10 | ~$160 | ~$18 | ~$142 |
| BGS | BGS 9.5 | ~$164 | $25 | ~$139 |
| BGS, strong subs or Black Label | BGS 9.5+ | can exceed $200 | $25 | can exceed $175 |
What the table actually says, with the Value pause in effect:
- SGC and CGC now NET MORE than PSA on this card. PSA's resale premium is real, but the roughly $80 Regular floor eats it on a $200 card: PSA nets about $120 while SGC and CGC net about $140.
- PSA only pulls back ahead once the card is valuable enough that its 10 to 20% resale premium outweighs the roughly $60 fee gap. Rough crossover: a PSA 10 comp around $300 or higher. Below that, during the pause, the cheaper graders win.
- Plain BGS still trails on an ordinary card; choosing it is paying for aesthetics unless real Black Label or strong subgrades are in play (the bottom row).
- The cheaper the card, the more the fee decides, and PSA's pause makes that brutal. On a sub-$150 card right now, PSA's $80 floor is often disqualifying on its own.
The pattern to internalize: the more ordinary the card, the more the fee decides; the more premium the card, the more the resale multiple decides. PSA's Value pause just moved the line, a lot of mid-value cards that used to pencil out for PSA no longer do.
So which grader should you use?
- High-value cards (PSA 10 comp roughly $300 or more), want the most liquid slab: PSA still wins even at the Regular $79.99 rate, the premium covers the fee up there.
- Mid-value and cheaper cards right now (during the Value pause): SGC or CGC almost always net more after the fee. This is the biggest near-term shift.
- Pack-fresh premium modern chrome where a 10 is genuinely in play: BGS, and accept the lottery.
- Pokemon or TCG: CGC belongs in the conversation with PSA.
- Vintage: PSA and SGC dominate buyer trust; SGC's tuxedo slab has a real vintage following.
The uncomfortable truth is that the right answer changes card by card, with the comp level, your fee tier, the gem-rate odds, and the resale discount all interacting. That is exactly why we built the grader comparison into The Report Card's engine: pick PSA, SGC, BGS, or CGC on any card and the expected value, max-buy price, and grade ladder recompute with that grader's fee and resale factor.
Frequently asked questions
Is a BGS 9.5 the same as a PSA 10?
No. The market typically prices a BGS 9.5 about 10 to 20% below a comparable PSA 10. A BGS 9.5 with multiple 10 subgrades can close that gap on premium modern, and a true BGS 10 or Black Label can exceed a PSA 10, but those are rare outcomes, not the baseline.
What is the cheapest card grading company in 2026?
SGC (around $15 Economy) and CGC ($15 to $18 Bulk and Economy) are the cheapest mainstream options. That gap got wider on June 2, 2026, when PSA paused its Value tiers: PSA's cheapest active option is now Regular at about $79.99 per card, up from the $32.99 Value tier. BGS Standard is $25.
Did PSA stop cheap grading in 2026?
PSA paused all four Value tiers (Value Bulk, Value, Value Plus, Value Max) on June 2, 2026 because of a roughly 10 million card backlog. PSA describes it as temporary, expected to reopen once the backlog falls to about 5 million cards, an estimated process of up to four months. Until then the cheapest PSA tier is Regular at about $79.99 per card.
Do SGC slabs sell for less than PSA?
Typically yes, on the order of 10 to 20% less for the same card and grade, and they can take longer to sell because fewer buyers search SGC. Sellers often accept that in exchange for lower fees and faster grading turnaround.
Is BGS worth it for modern cards?
Only when the card is pack-fresh premium modern with a real shot at high subgrades. A plain BGS 9.5 nets less than a PSA 10 and usually less than an SGC or CGC path after fees. Strong subgrades or a Black Label flip that math.
How do I decide for a specific card?
Compute resale times the grader's market discount, minus the grading fee, for each company, weighted by the odds of each grade. That is the whole calculation. The Report Card does it automatically for PSA, SGC, BGS, and CGC and shows the expected value of each path before you buy.
Sources
- BGS grading cost breakdown, CardGrade.io (2026 tiers: $25/$50/$100/$250)
- SGC grading cost guide, CardGrade.io (Economy ~$15, standard tiers)
- CGC raising prices for early 2026, cllct and CGC services and fees (Bulk $15, Economy $18, Standard $55, effective January 6, 2026)
- PSA Collectors Club value breakdown, Graders Choice (March 2026: memberships $149/$199, Value Bulk $24.99 with 20-card minimum)
- PSA grading cost increase 2026, Shop Cards USA
- PSA service-level update, May 2026 (Value pause) and ICv2 on the Value tier shutdown and Cardlines on the 10M backlog (paused June 2, 2026; minimum now ~$79.99, a 142% jump from $32.99)
- PSA vs BGS vs SGC vs CGC comparison 2026, ORB Sports Cards (market share, 10 to 20% PSA premium, SGC 2025 volume)
- BGS vs PSA resale guide, Phantom Display (BGS 9.5 subgrade and Black Label behavior)
- PSA vs CGC, Misprint (CGC competitiveness in Pokemon)
Fees and market behavior move. This page is dated at the top and we update it when the numbers change.
Run your own card through the engine
The Report Card turns an ask price, your comps, and the pop report into expected value, a max-buy price, and an honest confidence range. Every call we make with it is logged publicly, timestamped, before the outcome exists.
Get early access
See the public track record →
Written by Bayley Coleman, a collector in Fresno, CA. Every number above is sourced and dated; corrections welcome.